SCOTTSDALE (3TV/CBS 5) -- A transgender Valley veteran says the Supreme Court’s allowance of President Trump’s ban on transgender military service sends the wrong message.

“It feels not only that we’re less valued as a military servicemember but less valued as a human being,” said Danielle Lynch, who served in the Navy from 1991 to 1997.

[RELATED: Supreme Court allows military to implement transgender ban]

Lynch says she might have had a different name when she served, but she was still the same person.

“I was trans when I was in the military,” Lynch said. “I have always been, ever since I was little.”

The Supreme Court is allowing President Trump’s transgender military ban to go into effect.

The ban requires military members to serve “in their biological sex” which disqualifies many transgender people.

Today’s allowance isn’t a permanent decision. It simply allows the ban to take place while lower courts hash out the issue.

But for Lynch, it still signals a loss of potential.

“There are plenty of trans people that have a great amount of talent in various areas,” Lynch said. “Why not utilize that talent for the military if that person wishes to serve their country?”

 


Copyright 2019 KPHO/KTVK (KPHO Broadcasting Corporation). All rights reserved.

 

Recommended for you

(2) comments

JustinP

no one is less valuable than anyone else. however, there are issues with this in the military (cost, structure, authority, etc.). I doubt people knew this individual was trans in the late 80s and early 90s.

Wayne kenoff

You’re a man. Embrace that you weirdo

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.