PHOENIX (AP) -- A former Hacienda HealthCare nurse charged with sexually assaulting an incapacitated woman who later gave birth at the long-term care facility in Phoenix will appeal a court order requiring a test to determine if he has HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases.

Court Commissioner Roger Hartsell issued a Feb. 27 order requiring Nathan Sutherland to take the test and rejected a request Tuesday to reconsider the requirement.

[READ MORE: Hacienda HealthCare pregnancy investigation]

Sutherland attorney Edwin Molina argued the test would violate his client’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.

[RELATED: Hacienda HealthCare reaches oversight agreement with AZ Dept. of Health]

Molina says authorities have no probable cause to believe Sutherland has a sexually transmitted disease.

Authorities say Sutherland was working as a nurse at Hacienda HealthCare when he raped the 29-year-old victim.

He pleaded not guilty to the charges.

[ORIGINAL EXCLUSIVE STORY: Woman in vegetative state gives birth at Hacienda Healthcare in Phoenix]

Sutherland has since given up his nursing license.

 


© 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Recommended for you

(4) comments

Chris

Probably because he has AIDS.
Can we set the record straight on this piece of sh!te please. They keep referring to him as a nurse. He's not a nurse, he's a CNA. That's the equivalent of calling your landscaper your doctor.

Dbacks1

Why does this pos even have a choice in the matter?

momsacorn

"Sutherland attorney Edwin Molina argued the test would violate his client’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures." How the devil does a human being justify making a living by defending creatures like that soulless rapist? More sickening than the act itself.

GBfan4life

so is no one supposed to defend them? just curious, I get they are terrible and guilty most of the time, but it is still a job for someone to defend them... There are cases where they are mistakenly accused, then what? this case is 100% different, but the comment is like really? belittling a defense attorney congrats

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.