PHOENIX (AP) - An Arizona couple whose three children were taken into temporary state custody after they refused a doctor’s advice to bring their sick 2-year-old boy to a hospital have been granted custody that lets them care for and supervise their children.

[BODY CAM VIDEO: Chandler police remove sick kids from home (Feb. 25, 2019)]

Brooks Bryce said Wednesday that his children returned home about a month ago under the condition that Bryce’s parents act as “safety monitors.” The custody granted Tuesday by Maricopa County Juvenile Court Judge Timothy Ryan means Bryce’s parents no longer have to serve as monitors, but the state still retains decision-making authority for the children.

[RELATED: AZ lawmaker calls police raid to take sick Chandler child to hospital 'excessive']

Nearly three months ago, police officers wielding pistols and ballistic shields kicked in the door to the family’s home in Chandler in the middle of the night to bring the sick boy to the hospital. The Chandler officers knocked on their family’s door to check on the condition of the boy, who earlier in the day had a fever of 105 degrees.

[ORIGINAL STORY: Chandler police remove kids from home after sick child not taken to hospital]

The parents, who said the boy was improving after his fever broke, refused repeated requests by officers to open the door, so authorities got a court order allowing them to take temporary custody of the boy. Once inside, authorities discovered that the boy’s 4- and 6-year-old siblings also had been vomiting, so another order was obtained to take the older children into temporary custody. They also found an unsecured shotgun in the parents’ bedroom.

Though the mother initially refused to do so out of fear of the repercussions of not having the child vaccinated, she eventually agreed to take him to an emergency room. The doctor, who had learned that the mother had ignored the medical advice, then called child-welfare authorities, according to a police report.

“We didn’t do anything wrong,” Bryce said. Bryce said he and his wife will continue seeking the type of custody that would give them decision-making authority over their children.

Before Tuesday’s ruling, the parents were concerned that their fourth child, who was born last week, could be taken into temporary state custody.

The Arizona Department of Child Safety, which took temporary custody of the children after the Feb. 25 incident, declined to comment on Tuesday’s custody decision.

[RELATED: Video: Police storm home with guns drawn to take unvaccinated 2-year-old with high fever to hospital]

Nicholas Boca, an attorney representing the mother of the children, didn’t immediately return calls Wednesday seeking comment on behalf of his client.

Police said the forced entry was justified to tend to a child with a possible dangerous illness, explaining officers were acting under a law that lets a court order the temporary removal of children who are believed to be suffering from abuse and neglect. State law also lets police officers use reasonable force to enter a building where such children are believed to be suffering from abuse and neglect.

Critics say the door-breaking was more fitting for drug dealers, not parents who made a medical decision for their child.

Police had recommended to prosecutors that they file child abuse charges against the parents, who weren’t arrested as a result of the incident.

Amanda Steele, a spokesman for the Maricopa County Attorney’s office, said the prosecutorial agency is declining to bring charges against parents because there’s no reasonable likelihood of winning convictions.

Click/tap here to download the free azfamily mobile app..

© 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Recommended for you

(4) comments


This story is presenting an error too; they parents DO NOT have custody; they merely have custodial care of their own children; the STATE still has the decision making authority (legal custody) of their children. That's both legally and morally wrong, when the parents committed NO CRIME against their children. They were providing sufficient care that the disease was running its course and recovery was already under way, evidenced by the fever having broken. They probably should have shown the child to police but when confronted like they were, I can also see the parental protection mechanism coming into play. They didn't know the officers at their door in force, to kidnap their child.


too bad. Only reinforces other parents putting their child in danger.


Child wasn't in danger. Do your due diligence in researching. Child's temp had broken and was on the way down. Problem with parents is they didn't bring the kid in question out for the cops to see. That's the only thing they did wrong. The vac's comment is a new one; I had heard it was because they didn't have the 3k for ER visit (which is what it supposedly costs now).


Or reinforces the jack booted Droogs you call police are over-stepping their bounds.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.