Cutting through wireless hype

Posted: Updated:
(Source: everythingpossible via 123RF) (Source: everythingpossible via 123RF)
(DATA DOCTORS) -

Q: I’m trying to decide which cellular network to use and not sure how much of the marketing hype about the 1-percent difference is real? Any suggestions on how to figure out which one is best for me?

A: As our smartphone usage increases, figuring out which cellular network is best suited for our needs has become as important, if not more important, than choosing the right mobile device.

The marketing can be very confusing with claims like "fastest," "most dependable," "most popular," "most advanced," "most reliable," "unlimited," "next generation" -- things we all want from our wireless providers.

[SPECIAL SECTION: Data Doctors]

Manipulating the data
Creating impressive marketing claims based on a favorable interpretation of a specific data set is not exclusive to the wireless carriers, but they’ve been taking it to new heights.

Many of the claims that these companies make are hard to prove or disprove or are based on scenarios that may mean absolutely nothing to you depending on where you live and work.

Sprint’s campaign claiming that there is only a 1-percent difference in reliability between the major networks is based on its interpretation of the stats generated by recent Neilson data for average network reliability (voice and data) in the top 106 markets.  

While it can be argued that this claim is pretty vague, the term "network reliability" should not be confused with "network coverage" or "network speeds."

Why you should ignore the hype
No matter how good the overall rating for any carrier in any specific measurement may be, there’s a very important thing to keep in mind in every case: YMMV (your mileage may vary).

Where you live, work and travel will have the biggest impact on which carrier(s) offer the best option(s) for your specific needs.

Someone who travels a lot or lives in a rural area will have very different needs than someone who lives and works in a high-population urban area.

In virtually every third-party measurement of voice and data services, which city you live in is one of the biggest factors for which networks provide the "best" overall performance.

Real customer measurements
Each wireless carrier publishes a coverage map, generally available on its website, but I wouldn’t rely on it as empirical data as many complaints on the internet challenge the accuracy of these maps when you drill down to the street level.

There are a number of third-party resources that provide coverage maps based on data reported by actual users (usually via an app) who live and work in your area.

The Root Metrics interactive coverage map allows you to zoom down to street level to review coverage reports on each major carrier as well as by service type (voice vs. data).   

Both OpenSignal and Sensorly offer user-generated map data based on your location and carrier with the option to show 4G service versus slower 2G/3G coverage. You can also download their apps if you’d like to contribute data yourself.

Each of these resources collects data in various ways so using all three should help you better understand which carrier(s) perform the best for the areas you’ll frequent.

Copyright 2017 KPHO/KTVK (KPHO Broadcasting Corporation). All rights reserved.


  • Social Connect

  • Contact

    AZ Family