Appeal filed in son killing case over testimonyPosted: Updated:
PHOENIX (AP) -- Prosecutors in a case against an Arizona mother whose 1990 conviction in the killing of her young son was overturned have appealed a ruling that allows a key witness to assert his right against self-incrimination and refuse to testify against her at a retrial.
Authorities say Debra Milke had two men shoot her 4-year-old son in the head in the desert outside Phoenix in 1989. But after more than two decades on death row, an appeals court last year overturned the first-degree murder conviction.
Milke was released on bond and awaits a 2015 retrial.
The case against Milke rested largely on her purported confession, which now-retired Phoenix police Detective Armando Saldate did not record. That left jurors with his word alone that she told him about her involvement. Milke has maintained her innocence and denied she ever confessed.
After hearing arguments, Judge Rosa Mroz granted Saldate's request to assert his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refuse to testify at Milke's retrial.
Saldate claimed he feared potential federal civil rights charges after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cited numerous instances in which Saldate committed misconduct in previous cases, including lying under oath and violating suspects' rights -- details that were not provided to Milke's defense lawyers during her trial.
Mroz's ruling effectively gutted the state's case. Without Saldate's testimony, the judge said, the purported confession would most likely not be allowed at Milke's retrial.
"By allowing the witness to invoke `blanket' privilege, respondent judge's order prevents the witness from disclosing relevant information that is essential to the truth-seeking function of a trial," prosecutors wrote in the motion filed this week with the state Court of Appeals.
Oral arguments on the motion have been set for March 5.
Defense attorneys are seeking dismissal of the entire case against Milke, noting in a previous motion that "the only direct evidence linking defendant to the crimes is the defendant's alleged confession to Saldate."
Saldate and his attorney have not returned repeated phone calls from The Associated Press.
Prosecutors argue that if Saldate doesn't testify again, it "will cause irrevocable harm to the state's ability to present its case and will deny the victims' constitutional rights to justice and due process."
They also contend that Saldate has not met the burden for establishing a reasonable fear of prosecution if he testifies, noting that county and federal prosecutors have said they don't plan any charges against him.
Saldate's attorney have countered that those prosecutors have not provided anything in writing that formally grants his client immunity, and that there were no guarantees he would never face charges.
The two men convicted in the child's death did not testify against Milke and remain on death row.
© 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.